Alessia Cara's World Cup Stage: What Performers' Contracts at Major Events Actually Contain

Alessia Cara performing on stage at an opening ceremony

Photo : Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff from Washington D.C, United States / Wikimedia

5 min read June 12, 2026

Taking the world's biggest stage — and what it means legally

On June 12, 2026, Alessia Cara performed before more than 40,000 fans at BMO Field in Toronto as part of the FIFA World Cup 2026 opening ceremony for Canada. She shared the stage with Michael Bublé, Alanis Morissette, Jessie Reyez, and William Prince — a lineup representing the full spectrum of Canadian music. The ceremony was broadcast across FIFA's global platforms, FOX Sports, and dozens of international networks reaching hundreds of millions of viewers.

For Alessia Cara, a Grammy Award winner known for breakout hits since 2015, it was a career-defining moment. It was also a significant legal transaction — one that carries implications many artists underestimate until they see what a FIFA performance contract actually contains.

What major international event contracts typically include

FIFA does not publish artist contract terms. But entertainment lawyers who have reviewed agreements of this scale at international events consistently identify common elements that expose performers to legal and financial risk without proper counsel.

Exclusivity clauses: Artists performing at World Cup ceremonies routinely sign exclusivity windows that restrict competing commercial activity — brand deals, social media partnerships, or competing public performances — for a defined period before and after the event. For a June ceremony, these windows often run two to four weeks on each side.

Broadcast and image rights: FIFA holds global broadcast rights for the opening ceremony. The contract defines what FIFA can do with Alessia Cara's performance, her likeness, and the visual content around her. This typically includes archiving, use in promotional materials, licensing to broadcast partners in foreign territories, and clip use in future FIFA promotional content. What the artist retains — and what they give up — depends entirely on what was negotiated.

Synchronization and master licenses: When an artist performs original material at a broadcast event, two separate licenses come into play. The synchronization license covers the right to broadcast music alongside video. The master recording license covers use of any specific recorded performance. For a live event that is also recorded and broadcast, these rights must be negotiated separately. Where co-writers or publishers are involved, the complexity multiplies.

Residual payment structures: Under the US Copyright Office's framework for performance rights, artists retain rights to residuals from secondary uses of recorded performances. How international broadcasting royalties flow from a FIFA ceremony — and whether artists or their labels capture foreign territory royalties — depends on how the contract defines jurisdiction and secondary use.

FIFA's contracts, like those of all major international entertainment organizations, are drafted by legal teams whose primary obligation is to FIFA's interests. A first-time performer — or even an experienced artist with a manager but no entertainment lawyer — signing these documents without counsel can inadvertently transfer rights they did not intend to surrender.

Common points of contention that entertainment lawyers routinely identify and negotiate:

  • Royalty-free language: Certain event contracts attempt to capture global broadcast and streaming rights without per-stream or per-play royalty structures. An entertainment lawyer can negotiate carve-outs that preserve the artist's ongoing income from secondary uses
  • Social media restrictions: Major events sometimes bar artists from posting their own performance clips on social media for 30 to 90 days after the event — limiting the artist's ability to leverage the exposure they just earned from the world's largest audience
  • Intellectual property reversion clauses: A live performance of original compositions belongs to the artist as a creator, but contracts with ambiguous wording around "event content" can create disputes over who owns the recorded version of the live performance
  • Approval rights over production elements: Without explicit approval clauses, the event organizer controls stage design, visual effects, and styling decisions that directly affect the artist's public image
  • Foreign jurisdiction governance: FIFA agreements typically fall under Swiss law, which is unfamiliar territory for US and Canadian artists accustomed to American or Ontario-governed agreements. Dispute resolution processes in Swiss arbitration operate differently than US litigation

The financial picture beyond the performance fee

Major event appearances generate multiple income streams that extend well past the initial performance fee. For an artist like Alessia Cara, a World Cup opening ceremony on home soil — broadcast globally on a June afternoon — drives measurable downstream income through several channels.

Streaming numbers spike immediately after a global broadcast performance, particularly when the setlist features recognizable songs. Streaming royalties from that elevated play volume can represent meaningful income over the following weeks. Social media engagement driven by the ceremony translates to new followers, higher merchandise sales, and increased tour ticket demand. Promoters from markets where the broadcast reached new audiences often extend tour offers in the months following.

Managing these income streams — especially across international broadcast territories — requires the same financial coordination that an entertainment attorney and business manager provide together. Income from foreign broadcast royalties, tour-fee negotiations in new markets, and sponsorship valuations following a high-visibility event all benefit from proactive management.

You can also read about how FIFA has faced legal scrutiny over its commercial practices in the US market, which illustrates the broader context in which these performance contracts are negotiated.

What any performer should know before signing

You do not have to be performing at a World Cup to encounter these legal issues. Any musician, artist, or performer entering into a contract for a branded event — a corporate concert, a major music festival, a sponsored awards show ceremony — navigates the same legal territory at a smaller scale.

The protections that matter most:

  • Have your contract reviewed before you sign, not after you have already performed
  • Ensure your lawyer is specific to entertainment law and understands sync and master licensing
  • Negotiate approval rights for visual and production content that will be broadcast
  • Clarify what happens to recorded versions of your live performance and who controls distribution
  • Verify that exclusivity periods are time-limited and clearly defined — open-ended exclusivity provisions in event contracts are a common source of disputes

The most effective protection is not reactive — it is established before the performance date. By the time a contract dispute arises over a World Cup broadcast appearance, the leverage an artist had in negotiation is gone.

For US artists and performers seeking legal consultation on entertainment contracts, performance agreements, and intellectual property rights before or after a major event, ExpertZoom connects you with licensed entertainment attorneys who can review, explain, and negotiate on your behalf.

Our Experts

Advantages

Quick and accurate answers to all your questions and assistance requests in over 200 categories.

Thousands of users have given a satisfaction rating of 4.9 out of 5 for the advice and recommendations provided by our assistants.