Davis CaesarOn 28 February 2026, US and Israeli forces launched coordinated military strikes against Iran. Now in its third week, the conflict has left employers and employees across the United States grappling with a question that no HR manual fully addresses: what are the legal obligations of a company when war disrupts the workplace?
The War and Its Immediate Impact on US Workers
The conflict — which began with strikes targeting Iran's nuclear and ballistic missile infrastructure — has triggered airspace closures across the Middle East, disrupted global supply chains, and heightened anxiety among employees of Iranian, Israeli, and Arab descent, as well as those with family members in the region.
By 17 March 2026, CNN was reporting that US military officials had deployed additional troops to the region, even as President Trump expressed a desire to "wind down" the engagement. For American businesses, the situation remains fluid and legally complex.
The human dimension is significant: Iranian state media reported more than 18,000 civilian injuries in the opening weeks of the conflict. For US employees with family in Iran, Iraq, or Israel, the psychological impact is real and legally relevant.
What Federal Law Requires of Employers
US employers have several overlapping legal obligations that become acutely relevant during international conflicts:
Occupational Safety and Health Act (OSHA). The general duty clause requires employers to provide a workplace "free from recognized hazards." For employees travelling to conflict-adjacent regions for business, this means conducting updated risk assessments, reviewing travel insurance coverage (most standard corporate policies exclude active military conflict zones), and maintaining evacuation plans.
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act. Discrimination or harassment of employees based on national origin, religion, or ethnicity is illegal. In the context of the Iran-Israel war, this means employees of Iranian, Israeli, or Middle Eastern descent are protected against any form of scapegoating, hostile comments from colleagues, or differential treatment by management. The Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM) has explicitly called on employers to reinforce anti-discrimination protections during this period.
Employee Assistance Programs (EAPs). While not legally mandated, EAPs providing access to crisis counseling and mental health support are increasingly treated as a baseline expectation by employment attorneys — and their absence can be relevant in constructive dismissal or duty of care claims.
What Employees Can Do
For workers who believe their employer has failed to meet these obligations, the legal options are concrete:
Document everything. Hostile comments, changes in scheduling or assignments, denied requests for mental health leave — all should be recorded with dates, times, and witnesses where possible.
File an EEOC complaint. The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission handles complaints related to workplace discrimination. A charge must generally be filed within 180 days of the discriminatory act (300 days in states with their own anti-discrimination agencies).
Consult an employment attorney. Legal professionals specialising in employment law can assess whether an employer's conduct crosses the threshold from poor management into actionable negligence or discrimination. Many offer an initial consultation to evaluate the strength of a potential claim.
Request accommodation under the ADA. If war-related anxiety or trauma meets the clinical threshold for a disability (which it may, under the ADA's broad definition), employees may be entitled to reasonable accommodations — including remote work, adjusted schedules, or temporary reassignment.
Force Majeure, Supply Chains, and Business Contracts
Beyond employment law, the Iran-Israel conflict has prompted a surge of questions from small business owners about force majeure clauses in commercial contracts. If a supply chain disruption caused by the war prevents a US business from fulfilling a contract — shipping delays, raw material shortages, international payment blocks — can they invoke force majeure?
The answer depends on the specific contract language. Courts have historically applied a high bar: the disruption must be unforeseeable, beyond the party's control, and directly causative of the breach. Geopolitical instability in the Middle East, while serious, has been a feature of the global trade environment for decades — which means some courts may not consider it truly "unforeseeable."
For business owners navigating these questions, a commercial attorney can review contract language and advise on notice obligations, which typically must be given within days of identifying a force majeure event.
Workers with Family in the Region: Special Considerations
For US employees who have family members in Iran, Israel, or neighboring conflict zones, the situation carries a distinct set of pressures that employment law addresses incompletely but meaningfully.
Bereavement and emergency leave: Federal law does not mandate paid bereavement leave. However, many state laws — and most employer handbooks — include provisions for emergency family situations. An employment attorney can review what a specific employer is obligated to provide, and whether a denial of leave in these circumstances could constitute unlawful interference with protected family rights under applicable state law.
Mental health accommodations: The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) broadly defines disability to include mental health conditions that substantially limit a major life activity. Clinically significant anxiety, depression, or PTSD triggered by an active war involving one's family may qualify an employee for reasonable accommodations — including temporary remote work, schedule modifications, or paid medical leave under the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA).
Anti-retaliation protection: Employees who request accommodations, file EEOC complaints, or raise concerns internally about workplace discrimination are protected against retaliation. If an employer responds to a legitimate complaint with disciplinary action, reduced hours, or termination, that is itself a separate legal violation.
The Right Time to Seek Legal Advice
War creates urgency, but legal decisions made under pressure are often poor ones. Employment and commercial attorneys advise clients to seek counsel early — before situations escalate into formal disputes. Understanding your rights and obligations before a conflict reaches your workplace is significantly less costly than addressing a complaint or litigation after the fact.
Many employment attorneys offer a free initial consultation to assess whether a situation warrants formal action. For business owners dealing with contract and force majeure questions, the time-sensitive nature of notice clauses makes early counsel particularly important — waiting until a contract dispute is already in litigation forecloses many options.
Legal disclaimer: This article is informational and does not constitute legal advice. For your specific situation, consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction.
Expert Zoom connects individuals and business owners with qualified employment and commercial attorneys available for online consultations across all US states.
Speak to a legal expert on Expert Zoom — no waiting, no commute.
