A new trial opened in Argentina on 14 April 2026 to determine who bears legal responsibility for the death of football icon Diego Maradona. Seven healthcare professionals — including neurosurgeon Leopoldo Luque, psychiatrist Agustina Cosachov, and psychologist Carlos Díaz — face between eight and 25 years in prison if convicted of homicide with possible intent. The proceedings, which resumed after a first trial collapsed in scandal, have gripped audiences worldwide, forcing a question that matters far beyond Buenos Aires: what are the legal and ethical obligations of doctors when a patient is in their care?
What Prosecutors Allege Went Wrong
Maradona died on 25 November 2020, aged 60, from a heart attack at a rented house in Tigre, Argentina, where he was recovering from emergency brain surgery performed just days earlier. Prosecutors argue that the medical team assigned to monitor him abandoned their duty of care in a series of critical ways: there was no proper medical equipment at the residence, monitoring was intermittent at best, and the team failed to respond adequately as his condition deteriorated overnight.
Shock images of Maradona's body, presented to the court in April 2026, showed his stomach grotesquely swollen — evidence, prosecutors contend, of prolonged neglect rather than a sudden acute event. On 21 April, his daughter Giannina testified before the panel of three judges. A verdict is expected in early June 2026.
The trial has reignited global debate about what it means for a medical professional to be truly responsible for a patient's welfare — and about what patients and their families can do when they believe that responsibility has been betrayed.
What Duty of Care Means in UK Medicine
In England and Wales, the legal concept of duty of care is firmly established in clinical practice. According to the General Medical Council (GMC), every registered doctor has a professional obligation to act in patients' best interests, maintain their competence, and respond promptly when a patient's condition deteriorates.
In legal terms, proving a breach of duty of care requires establishing three things: that a duty existed between the doctor and patient, that the duty was breached by falling below the standard of a reasonably competent practitioner, and that the breach directly caused harm. This is the same framework that guides clinical negligence claims in the UK — and the same logic that prosecutors in Buenos Aires are applying, albeit under Argentine law.
The Bolam Test and Beyond
British courts have historically applied the Bolam test when assessing medical negligence: was the doctor's conduct consistent with a responsible body of medical opinion? In 2015, the Supreme Court added a further refinement in Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board, establishing that doctors must also disclose material risks to patients — shifting the standard from "what a doctor might reasonably do" toward "what a patient needs to know."
Taken together, these standards mean that a UK doctor who leaves a critically ill patient without monitoring, or who fails to arrange appropriate emergency intervention, faces serious professional and potentially criminal consequences. The GMC can suspend or strike off a doctor found to have acted in a way that puts patients at risk.
What UK Patients Have the Right to Expect
If you believe a doctor has failed in their duty of care, UK law gives you several avenues. NHS patients have three years from the date of the negligent act — or from when they first reasonably became aware of it — to bring a clinical negligence claim. According to NHS Resolution, 83% of clinical negligence claims in 2024–25 were resolved without formal legal proceedings, suggesting that early, structured complaints can achieve results.
Beyond litigation, the NHS Patient Advice and Liaison Service (PALS) provides a non-legal route to raise concerns about care. Patients also have the right to access their complete medical records and to request a second opinion at any stage of treatment.
If the failure is serious enough to amount to professional misconduct, a complaint to the GMC can trigger a fitness to practise investigation. In the most severe cases — where a doctor's actions or omissions lead to death and evidence suggests gross negligence — the Crown Prosecution Service can pursue criminal charges, as occurred with the case of surgeon Ian Paterson, convicted in 2017 for performing unnecessary operations.
When to Seek Expert Help
Navigating a clinical negligence claim is complex. Medical experts are required to assess whether the standard of care fell below what was acceptable, and legal representation is typically necessary for any claim above small claims threshold. A medical negligence solicitor can advise on whether a case is viable, manage the evidence-gathering process, and negotiate with NHS trusts or private providers.
The Maradona case is an extreme example — seven professionals potentially facing decades in prison for the care of one famous patient. But the underlying principles echo every day in UK hospitals and GP surgeries. Duty of care is not an abstract concept; it is a contractual and ethical obligation that runs from the moment a clinical relationship begins.
The Broader Lesson
Whether or not the seven Argentine defendants are convicted, the trial sends a clear signal: accountability in medicine does not end at the consulting room door. Monitoring a patient's recovery, maintaining appropriate equipment, and responding to warning signs are core clinical duties — not optional extras.
For UK patients, the key takeaway is practical: if something feels wrong, escalate promptly. Request written records of your treatment plan. Ask for a second opinion if you are uncertain. And if harm has occurred, seek both medical and legal advice early — because the three-year limitation period starts running from the moment the damage was, or should have been, apparent.
This article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute medical or legal advice. If you have concerns about your medical care, contact PALS, your GP, or a qualified medical negligence solicitor.

Abigail Clarke